In February, oil prices rose around 10%. At the same time, global equity markets continued to rise, with oil sensitive cyclicals and financials leading the pack. Better than expected growth data and abundant liquidity creation clearly outweighed the negative impact of high oil prices. Can this continue?<\/p>\n
Historically, equity markets have been able to cope quite well with rising oil prices, as long as the rise was gradual and driven
\nby a growth in demand. After all, an increasing demand for oil generally coincides with satisfactory economic growth, a factor
\nwhich offers compensation. However, whenever the rise in oil prices was steep (30%+ in three months) and\/or driven by
\ndisruptions in supply, equity markets suffered a clear setback.<\/p>\n
In that sense the complacency of investors in February was unusual, as the rise in oil prices was quite significant and could
\nnot be fully explained by demand factors. In fact, other commodity prices hardly increased in this period. Therefore, part of the
\nmove in oil was probably due the growing tensions around Iran, which could lead to future disruptions in supply. Even so, the
\ncurrent geopolitical risk premium in the oil price is less than 10 dollar, still insignificant in relation to the expected impact of any
\nmishap in the region, which could easily boost prices by 30 dollar or more.<\/p>\n
The complacency last month was not only seen among investors, but also among consumers and companies. For example, the percentage increase in US consumer confidence outpaced even the rise of gasoline prices at the pump! The same positivism was visible in Germany.<\/p>\n
This behaviour can only be explained by the historically unprecedented stimulus provided by the major central banks in the
\nworld. Investors worry less about oil supply if they do not need to worry about liquidity supply. Besides this, the ongoing fiscal
\nstimulus and surprisingly strong job creation in the US have clearly supported sentiment.<\/p>\n
After the strong start to the year equity markets are getting vulnerable to profit taking. A further rise in oil prices could well
\nprovide the excuse for doing so, certainly as the momentum in liquidity creation seems to have peaked. It is important to
\nrealise that an oil driven correction would likely lead to a complete reversal in sector performance. The cyclical sectors, which
\nhave showed the strongest rise year to date, would suffer most. The defensive sectors, which have clearly lagged year to
\ndate, would hold up relatively well. The only sector which offers protection against this outcome is the energy sector,
\nespecially the oil majors.<\/p>\n
To conclude, we do not see the recent rise in oil prices as an immediate threat to the sentiment in equity markets. The rise is
\nnot (yet) steep enough and supply fears are not (yet) big enough to outweigh the positive effects of liquidity creation, ultra low
\ninterest rates and generally decent economic activity. However, any continuation of the recent price trend should be seen as a
\nrisk factor, certainly as the momentum in liquidity creation has peaked and elections within the eurozone appear on the
\nhorizon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After the strong start to the year equity markets are getting vulnerable to profit taking. A further rise in oil prices could well
\nprovide the excuse for doing so, certainly as the momentum in liquidity creation seems to have peaked<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":22662,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1483],"tags":[1663,1655,1671,1744,1651,2087,1746],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22664"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22664\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}