{"id":37728,"date":"2014-10-24T00:00:34","date_gmt":"2014-10-23T22:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/opinion\/chinese-gdp-a-myth\/"},"modified":"2019-12-30T23:09:11","modified_gmt":"2019-12-30T22:09:11","slug":"chinese-gdp-a-myth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/opinion\/chinese-gdp-a-myth\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese GDP, a myth?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Compared with Q2 2014, when growth reached 7.5% year-on-year and 2.0% quarter-on-quarter (see Chart 1<\/strong>), the
\nextent of the slowdown is far less serious than suggested by other economic indicators.
\n\"le_pib_chinois_-_un_mythe_-_graphe1-en.jpg\"<\/p>\n

Although industrial output did accelerate slightly in September compared with August, the increase in Q3 2014
\nremains very slight by past standards, while urban investment has declined to an all-time low (see Chart 2<\/strong> above). <\/p>\n

Similarly the consumption of energy such as electricity and rail traffic are increasing much more slowly than in the
\npast (see chart 3<\/strong>). Retail sales are the one indicator to be putting up a fair resistance, with growth remaining stable
\nin real terms.
\n\"le_pib_chinois_-_un_mythe_-_graphe2-en.jpg\"<\/p>\n

This lag can in fact be explained by an analysis of the contribution made by the different demand components
\ntowards GDP growth. Domestic demand is indeed weak. Investment increased by only 3.8% year-on-year, when this
\ncomponent accounts for half of China\u2019s GDP. Consumption (households and public administrations) is not
\ndecelerating, but growth for this component remains below 6% year-on-year. Considering GDP growth reached 7.3%
\nover this period, domestic demand is visibly very weak. The explanation of this myth comes from the strong
\ncontribution by net exports, as exports increased by 13% and imports by only 6% (Natixis estimates). The 7.3%
\nGDP growth therefore owed much to performances on the export front, whereas domestic demand (hence imports)
\nwas weak, as highlighted above (see Chart 4<\/strong>).<\/p>\n

Given the weak domestic demand, Chinese growth remains exposed to some downside risk, this risk being more
\nserious than is suggested by the slight slowdown in GDP growth. With the Chinese economy transitioning to a new
\ngrowth model, former engines of growth such as investment are stalling, while the new engines of growth are still
\nstuttering. The current air pocket therefore exposes the country to the risk of a slowdown, with the authorities keen
\nto limit the extent of this dip. That is why the authorities are taking targeted measures to support the economy, at
\nboth monetary and fiscal levels.<\/p>\n

The transition being a work-in-progress, the downside risk could be present for some time. We do not see there
\nbeing an economic recovery in the short term and our estimates therefore remain for GDP growth of 7.3% in 2013
\nand 7% in 2015. As and when structural reforms are pushed through, China\u2019s economic cycle will enter an upward
\nleg characterised by more stable medium- to long-term growth. For more details see the special report<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This change in growth model from investment (industrial sector) to consumption (services sector) implies not only a
\nsecular slowdown in Chinese growth but also a lasting slowdown in Chinese demand for commodities, especially
\nthose used massively in the construction and heavy industrial sectors. Other import categories are less affected,
\nespecially those meeting the needs of Chinese household consumption. The breakdown of imports by region of origin
\nsupports this analysis: in nominal terms, imports from the US increased by 12.5%, those from Europe by 9.1%,
\nwhereas imports from Latin America increased by only 1.2% and imports from Africa in fact decreased by 0.5%
\nyear-on-year in September.