{"id":52456,"date":"2016-05-25T00:30:18","date_gmt":"2016-05-24T22:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/news\/ctas-robust-in-moderately-challenging-environment\/"},"modified":"2019-12-31T00:45:47","modified_gmt":"2019-12-30T23:45:47","slug":"ctas-robust-in-moderately-challenging-environment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/news\/ctas-robust-in-moderately-challenging-environment\/","title":{"rendered":"CTAs robust in moderately challenging environment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The last twelve months have shown a <strong>dispersion<\/strong> in the returns<br \/>\nof CTAs. At the end of Q1 2016, the rolling one-year performance<br \/>\nof the SG Trend Index, which measures the performance of the<br \/>\ntrend following industry, was -4.1%, whereas the performance<br \/>\nof the Lyxor Epsilon Global Trend fund was -1.7% for the same<br \/>\nperiod. Over 2015 as a whole the Lyxor Epsilon Global Trend<br \/>\nfund returned +5.4% and during Q1 2016 it returned +3.0%.<br \/>\n<em>\u201cThe CTAs who did well during this period where those which<br \/>\nreduced overall exposures and focused on the few trends<br \/>\navailable\u201d<\/em>, explains Guillaume Jamet, principal fund manager<br \/>\nof the Lyxor Epsilon systematic trend program.<\/p>\n<p><quote> Trend following strategies are also<br \/>\nreferred to as Commodity Trading<br \/>\nAdvisors, or CTAs. They exploit the<br \/>\nmomentum effect: prices going up<br \/>\n(going down) tend to keep going<br \/>\nup (going down). Trend following<br \/>\nstrategies work best in environments<br \/>\nin which markets show clear and<br \/>\nidentifiable trends and in which<br \/>\ncorrelations between asset class<br \/>\nreturns are low.<\/quote><\/p>\n<p>The less advantageous market context relates both to<br \/>\ncorrelations and on the level of market \u2018<em>trendiness<\/em>\u2019: The <strong>Lyxor<br \/>\nEpsilon Correlation Index<\/strong> increased from 20% to 24% during<br \/>\nthe first quarter of 2016, approaching 26%, which is the<br \/>\naverage index value since it was created in 2004.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.next-finance.net\/http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" aligncenter size-full wp-image-52452\" src=\"IMG\/jpg\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index.jpg\" alt=\"lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index.jpg\" align=\"center\" width=\"489\" height=\"432\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<em>The index is backward looking: it analyzes some of the drivers of the past performance of trend following strategies, but gives no indication<br \/>\nof future results.<br \/>\n<br \/>Source: Lyxor AM. Data as of 31\/3\/2016 <\/em> <\/p>\n<p><quote> The Lyxor Epsilon Correlation<br \/>\nIndex* uses various return and risk<br \/>\nindicators to estimate the correlation<br \/>\namongst markets on a rolling 1-year<br \/>\nbasis. A low value means that markets<br \/>\ntend to move independently, while a<br \/>\nhigh value means that markets tend<br \/>\nto move in lockstep.<\/quote><\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>This environment clearly was less favorable than the twelve months ending Q4 2015, without becoming worrisome<\/em>\u201d,<br \/>\ncomments Guillaume Jamet. <\/p>\n<p>During the same period the Lyxor Epsilon Trend Index dropped from -2% to -10%. This value is well below 4%, which<br \/>\nis the average index value since it was created in 2004. <\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Markets have been clearly rangy during the lasts 12 months<br \/>\ndue to a high level of macro-economic uncertainty. 2016 seemed to start with trends, such as on equities and on oil,<br \/>\nbut most of these trends reverted as of late February<\/em>\u201d, tells Mr. Jamet. \u201c<em>Models that adapted to this environment will<br \/>\nbe reactive once trends re-occur. The overall exposure level of the Lyxor Epsilon Global Trend fund is below average<br \/>\ncurrently.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n<p><quote><br \/>\nThe Lyxor Epsilon Trend Index* uses<br \/>\nvarious return and risk variables to<br \/>\ncalculate the average strength of trends<br \/>\non financial markets on a 1-year rolling<br \/>\nbasis. A high measure means that, on<br \/>\naverage, the financial markets included in<br \/>\nthe index have been characterized by a<br \/>\nhigher directionality, either downward or<br \/>\nupward. A value close to zero corresponds<br \/>\nto a regime when most markets are trading<br \/>\nrandomly. A low negative index value means<br \/>\nthat markets are \u201crangy\u201d on average.<\/quote><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.next-finance.net\/http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" aligncenter size-full wp-image-52454\" src=\"IMG\/jpg\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index.jpg\" alt=\"lyxor_epsilon_trend_index.jpg\" align=\"center\" width=\"491\" height=\"435\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<em>The index is backward looking: it analyzes some of the drivers of the past performance of trend following strategies, but gives no indication<br \/>\nof future results.<br \/>\n<br \/>Source: Lyxor AM. Data as of 31\/3\/2016<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Due to their diversification over a broad investment universe and their ability to go short, trend following strategies<br \/>\nare amongst the few strategies able to <strong>benefit<\/strong> from <strong>any macro<\/strong> trend, be it bear equity markets, interest rate hikes or<br \/>\ncurrency wars.<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-52456 gallery-columns-3 gallery-size-herald-lay-c1'><figure class='gallery-item'>\n\t\t\t<div class='gallery-icon landscape'>\n\t\t\t\t<a class=\"herald-popup\" href='http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index.jpg'><img width=\"470\" height=\"313\" src=\"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index-470x313.jpg\" class=\"attachment-herald-lay-c1 size-herald-lay-c1\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index-470x313.jpg 470w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index-300x200.jpg 300w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index-414x276.jpg 414w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index-130x86.jpg 130w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_correlation_index-187x124.jpg 187w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px\" \/><\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/figure><figure class='gallery-item'>\n\t\t\t<div class='gallery-icon landscape'>\n\t\t\t\t<a class=\"herald-popup\" href='http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index.jpg'><img width=\"470\" height=\"313\" src=\"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index-470x313.jpg\" class=\"attachment-herald-lay-c1 size-herald-lay-c1\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index-470x313.jpg 470w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index-300x200.jpg 300w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index-414x276.jpg 414w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index-130x86.jpg 130w, http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/lyxor_epsilon_trend_index-187x124.jpg 187w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px\" \/><\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The first quarter of 2016 has seen the conjuncture of a significant rise in the Epsilon<br \/>\nCorrelation Index with a drop of the Epsilon Trend Index, confirming a moderately<br \/>\nchallenging environment for trend following strategies over the last 12 months.<br \/>\nThose CTAs with the right approach resisted. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":52452,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1470],"tags":[1687,1655,1658,1723,1690,1651,1437,1662,1814,2068,1672],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52456"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52456"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52457,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52456\/revisions\/52457"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}