{"id":77721,"date":"2019-02-25T03:10:00","date_gmt":"2019-02-25T02:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/opinion\/brexit-and-beyond-investing-in-europe-amid-political-risk\/"},"modified":"2019-02-25T03:10:00","modified_gmt":"2019-02-25T02:10:00","slug":"brexit-and-beyond-investing-in-europe-amid-political-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/opinion\/brexit-and-beyond-investing-in-europe-amid-political-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"Brexit and beyond: Investing in Europe amid Political Risk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Europe today offers plenty of opportunities for bottom-up<br \/>\nstockpicking based on fundamental analysis, the key to investing success. But a thoughtful overlay of<br \/>\npolitical risk analysis is essential to complete the picture and reinforce investing conviction in these tense<br \/>\ntimes.<\/p>\n<p>For equity investors, the Brexit saga is probably the number one political headache today. Brexit is<br \/>\ncreating three major risks for companies. The first is trade disruption: firms that must move parts or<br \/>\nfinished goods across the UK border could be vulnerable to severe, though probably temporary,<br \/>\ndisruption in the event of a no-deal Brexit. Currency risk and the impact of pound on companies\u2019 earnings<br \/>\nis the second major concern, while the third one is to UK economic growth that could suffer from<br \/>\npersistent uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p><quote>When researching stocks in the UK and across Europe, we ask whether a company is exposed to the<br \/>\nspecific risks that we\u2019ve identified. Then, we assess whether those risks are threatening its future cash<br \/>\nflows and, if so, to what extent they\u2019re adequately priced into the company\u2019s stock.<\/quote><\/p>\n<p>Some of the companies that are potentially most exposed to Brexit may not even be listed in the UK.<br \/>\nPeugeot of France, for example, both makes cars in the UK and sells more of its production to UK<br \/>\nconsumers than do its main European-listed rivals. So it\u2019s important that portfolio-level risk analysis takes<br \/>\naccount of Brexit impacts on non-UK companies; you can\u2019t judge a portfolio\u2019s exposure to Brexit just by<br \/>\nlooking at its weight in UK stocks.<\/p>\n<p>There are two sides to the Brexit risk coin. Investors also need to consider what will happen if a<br \/>\nfavourable Brexit deal is reached\u2014or, conceivably, if the UK ends up not leaving the EU after all. These<br \/>\noutcomes would likely benefit UK stocks that have traded at a Brexit discount, as well as cyclical<br \/>\nEuropean companies that have suffered amid recent risk aversion. Investors in European stocks need to<br \/>\nensure that they are neither overexposed to Brexit downsides or underexposed to possible Brexit-related<br \/>\nmarket rallies.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, we think many companies exposed to Brexit risks offer attractive return potential today. Take<br \/>\nJohnson Matthey, for example, which makes materials for auto catalysts that are enjoying growing<br \/>\ndemand as emissions standards tighten. Or Marks &#038; Spencer, the food, clothing and homeware retailer,<br \/>\nwhere new management is taking the measures needed to turn around performance, in our view. And<br \/>\noutside the UK, Peugeot is continuing to reduce costs both in its long-established units and the<br \/>\nbusinesses it acquired essentially for free from General Motors last year.<br \/>\nOf course, Brexit is only one political risk hanging over European markets today. From street protests in<br \/>\nFrance to governments in Hungary, Poland and elsewhere, the resurgence of populism in Europe is<br \/>\nchallenging EU norms. As the May European Parliamentary elections approach, investors may become<br \/>\nconcerned that further gains by antiestablishment parties could undermine the stability of the EU\u2019s<br \/>\ninstitutions.<\/p>\n<p><quote>In our view these fears are overdone. The Italian government\u2019s recent decision to abide by eurozone<br \/>\nfiscal rules, following the earlier example of Greece, suggests that populist rhetoric in the opposition often<br \/>\ngives way to pragmatism in government: the overriding political imperative to remain in the euro retains<br \/>\nstrong popular support, as polls continue to show.<\/quote><\/p>\n<p>Still, investors need to be on the lookout for less well-publicized political risks that can have a real impact<br \/>\non companies\u2019 earnings. In Spain, for example, recent tax changes introduced by the center-left coalition<br \/>\ngovernment have impacted some banks, and efforts to pass a budget this year will be complicated by the<br \/>\npolitics of Catalan separatism.<\/p>\n<p>Political risk is not a reason to avoid European equities. Europe today offers plenty of opportunities for<br \/>\nbottom-up stockpicking based on fundamental analysis, the key to investing success. But a thoughtful<br \/>\noverlay of political risk analysis is essential to complete the picture and reinforce investing conviction in<br \/>\nthese tense times.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Political risk has been a feature in European markets for years. Lately, from Italy\u2019s fiscal squabbles to<br \/>\nturmoil in the streets of France, it feels like the volume of political noise has risen. However, political risk is<br \/>\nnot a reason to avoid European equities. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":77719,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1480],"tags":[1809,1655,1657,1651,2087,2222],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77721"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77721\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/77719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}