{"id":80991,"date":"2019-07-02T01:40:00","date_gmt":"2019-07-01T23:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/strategie\/our-take-on-opposite-macro-cta-views-on-bonds\/"},"modified":"2020-01-02T22:10:11","modified_gmt":"2020-01-02T21:10:11","slug":"our-take-on-opposite-macro-cta-views-on-bonds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/strategie\/our-take-on-opposite-macro-cta-views-on-bonds\/","title":{"rendered":"Our take on opposite Macro\/CTA views on bonds"},"content":{"rendered":"

Systematic Macro and CTAs
\nare also appreciated for their diversification ability and have a good track record throughout bad times, when risk
\nassets experienced sharp and protracted drawdowns. Yet, we argue that both strategies are quite different.<\/p>\n

Performance between Systematic Macro and CTA strategies was comparable over the past 18 months (+2-3%)
\naccording to Lyxor UCITS Peer Groups. Concurrently, the 6-month correlation of daily returns between CTA and
\nSystematic Macro strategies is as high at 0.7 at present (0.3 between CTAs and Discretionary Global Macro). From
\nthis perspective, they have common factors. Yet, their volatility is nonetheless contrasted. We estimate that CTAs\u2019
\nreturn volatility was 6% (annualized) over the past twelve months, while Systematic Macro\u2019s volatility was much
\nlower, at 3.6%.<\/p>\n

In terms of positioning, there are also substantial differences between them. The strong trend in bond prices since
\nSeptember 2018 has led CTAs to accumulate elevated net long positions on fixed income, especially in Europe. In
\nturn, driven by fundamental inputs, Systematic Macro strategies expect a rise in bond yields and have accumulated
\nnet short positions on bonds. If monetary policy accommodation boosts growth and inflation expectations, this
\nwould steepen yield curves and push bond yields higher. Global Macro strategies are positioned to benefit from
\nthis outcome, while CTAs would suffer from such development.<\/p>\n

Our preference for CTAs vs. Systematic Global Macro was rewarding in Q2. Going forward, we maintain this
\npreference, but we are concerned about potential trend reversals in fixed income. Bond yields have reached very
\nlow levels, particularly in Europe. The bleak macro picture does not suggest they should rise materially and
\nsustainably in the short to medium term. But even a modest repricing in bond yields would hurt CTAs, which hold
\nsizeable long exposures. As such, we maintain the preference for CTAs but argue that recent performance could
\nbe seen as a reason to take some profits and rebalance towards Systematic Macro strategies to protect portfolios
\nagainst a potential rise in bond yields.<\/p>\n

\"-354.jpg\"<\/a>