{"id":81114,"date":"2019-07-11T01:17:22","date_gmt":"2019-07-10T23:17:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/note\/sovereign-investors-pivot-away-from-europe-towards-china\/"},"modified":"2019-07-11T01:17:22","modified_gmt":"2019-07-10T23:17:22","slug":"sovereign-investors-pivot-away-from-europe-towards-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/note\/sovereign-investors-pivot-away-from-europe-towards-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Sovereign Investors pivot away from Europe towards China"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This year\u2019s study was conducted face-to-face amongst 139 individual sovereign investors<br \/>\nand central bank reserve managers across the globe representing $20.3trillion[[Sourced by NMG Consulting: total assets of those sampled stands at $17 trillion as at year end 2017.]] of assets, of which 71 are central banks (62 in 2018), reflecting their growing status as<br \/>\nsovereign investors.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fixed income displaces equities as largest asset class for sovereigns<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2018 was a challenging year for sovereigns as weak and volatile equity markets led to a<br \/>\ndecline in overall investment returns. On average, sovereign investors achieved returns<br \/>\nof 4% in 2018 compared to 9% in 2017. Despite the decrease in returns, sovereigns<br \/>\nperformed well given negative returns from global equities, which fell 8.7% in US dollar<br \/>\nterms during the year, according to MSCI World Index***.<\/p>\n<p>The majority of sovereigns (89%) anticipate the end of the economic cycle within the<br \/>\nnext two years. This combined with volatility concerns and the prospect of negative<br \/>\nreturns from equities has led to increased fixed income allocations and more<br \/>\ndiversification in allocations to infrastructure, real estate and private equity markets.<\/p>\n<p>Fixed income allocations increased to 33% in 2019 from 30% in 2018, becoming<br \/>\nsovereigns\u2019 largest asset class. Meanwhile, allocations to equities fell from 33% to 30%,<br \/>\nmarking the end of a five-year trend between 2013 and 2018 during which fixed income<br \/>\nfell from 35% to 30% as equities posted strong gains.<\/p>\n<p>Challenging equity markets in 2018 highlighted the limitations of market-cap weighted<br \/>\npassive strategies, as well as some more basic factor strategies. Some of the most<br \/>\npopular factor strategies, e.g. value and momentum, performed below sovereign<br \/>\nexpectations during 2018, and some of those adopting a simple \u2018set and forget\u2019 approach<br \/>\nto their factor allocations reported negative returns. This is encouraging a move away<br \/>\nfrom a single-factor approach towards multi-factor positions that can better adapt to<br \/>\nchanging market conditions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sovereigns optimistic on China<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>China\u2019s attractiveness rating for sovereign investors has improved more than any other<br \/>\nmajor region since 2017. Some 82% of sovereigns cited trade tensions as having had an<br \/>\ninfluence on asset allocation decisions, yet China\u2019s attractiveness as an investment<br \/>\ndestination over the next three years scored an average rating of 6.1 out of 10 among<br \/>\nsovereign investors, a marked increase on 2017\u2019s 5.2 rating.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the fact that the study was carried out during a period of ongoing rhetoric on a<br \/>\ntrade war, those surveyed saw China\u2019s pledge to improve safeguarding of intellectual<br \/>\nproperty as grounds for optimism that some resolution of tensions would be reached.<\/p>\n<p>The unique competitive dynamics of China are appealing for sovereigns seeking more<br \/>\ndiversification, the survey found, with equities continuing to be the asset class most<br \/>\nfavoured. Approximately 90% of sovereigns with China exposure held Chinese equities,<br \/>\nshowing that the government\u2019s measures to open the market to foreign investors are<br \/>\nbearing fruit. Fixed income allocations are also likely to increase with Chinas inclusion in<br \/>\nmajor bond indices and initiatives, such as Bond Connect, giving foreign investors access<br \/>\nto the local bond market. Transparency remains a significant obstacle to higher<br \/>\nallocations in China for sovereigns, while for those sovereigns with no existing allocation<br \/>\nto China, investment restrictions and currency risk are seen as the main impediments.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Investors don\u2019t see economic attractiveness in Europe<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A combination of slowing economic growth and perceptions of rising political risk have<br \/>\nled to a decline in the perceived attractiveness of major European economies. Brexit is<br \/>\nnow influencing asset allocation decisions for 64% of sovereigns. <\/p>\n<p>While<br \/>\ncontinental Eurozone internal politics, seen as increasingly uncertain with the<br \/>\nascendance of populist movements in major European economies such as Germany and<br \/>\nItaly, is impacting asset allocation decisions for 46%. This has resulted in Europe falling<br \/>\nout of favour, with nearly one third of sovereign investors decreasing allocations to<br \/>\nEurope in 2018 and a similar number planning further decreases in 2019. Only 13% of<br \/>\nsovereigns plan on increasing allocations to Europe this year, compared to a 40%<br \/>\nallocation to Asia and 36% to Emerging Markets.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Renminbi finds a bigger place in Central Banks reserve portfolios<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a group, Central Banks believe the end of the economic cycle will be characterised by<br \/>\na gradual slowdown, rather than an economic crisis. However, the uncertain market<br \/>\nenvironment, combined with an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve, led many of them<br \/>\nto find perceived safety in increased allocations to deposits, and, in some cases, gold.<\/p>\n<p>Central banks bought 651.5 tonnes of gold in 2018, the second highest annual total on<br \/>\nrecord and up 74% from the year earlier12<br \/>\n. Over a third (35%) of central banks increased<br \/>\nallocations over the last three years, with 32% expecting further increases over the next three years, but overall gold holdings remain steady at around 4% of overall reserve<br \/>\nportfolios. Respondents to the study reported additional challenges associated with gold<br \/>\nas a reserve asset, including volatility, storage costs and the political implications of<br \/>\nselling. 75% of Central Banks agreed or strongly agreed that selling gold holdings would<br \/>\nattract negative domestic media coverage in their country. <\/p>\n<p>Central Banks continue to diversify away from the negative yields of government bonds<br \/>\n(especially in Europe) into bank deposits; and away from the US dollar. The main<br \/>\nbeneficiary has been the Renminbi and between 2017-18, allocations to China\u2019s currency<br \/>\novertook the Australian and Canadian dollar, with 43% of central banks now holding it in<br \/>\ntheir portfolios, compared to 40% in 2018. Over a quarter (27%) of central banks expect<br \/>\nto continue to increase Renminbi reserves in 2019, making it the most favoured currency<br \/>\nfor the year ahead, with increased allocations expected to be taken from the USD, EUR<br \/>\nand GBP. Though USD remains the dominant reserve currency, allocations reached a 5-<br \/>\nyear low, falling from 62.7% of global currency reserves to 61.7%.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Environmental considerations move ESG firmly into the spotlight<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>ESG is an increasingly important issue for sovereigns and Central Banks. Since 2017, the<br \/>\npercentage of sovereigns with a specific ESG policy rose from 46% to 60%.<br \/>\n20% of Central Banks now have an ESG policy, compared to 11% in 2017. Approaches<br \/>\nto ESG are increasingly sophisticated, having moved beyond screening to incorporate<br \/>\nmore advanced forms of integration.<\/p>\n<p>There has also been a shift in focus of the nature of ESG activity. While asset owners<br \/>\nhave, in the past, focused on issues of governance due to clearer risk and return<br \/>\nbenefits, these factors are now often assumed by ESG adopters. For sovereigns,<br \/>\nenvironmental concerns are increasingly becoming the lead focus, with carbon emissions<br \/>\nand climate change the single most important ESG issue.<\/p>\n<p>Alex Millar, Head of EMEA Institutional Distribution Sales, Invesco, commented:<br \/>\n<em>\u201cOur wide-ranging study reveals that sovereigns and Central Banks are adopting defend<br \/>\nand diversify investment strategies. The combination of a likely end-of-cycle within two<br \/>\nyears and an uncertain global environment has led to allocations to fixed income, private<br \/>\nmarkets, and emerging markets growing in portfolios. Political uncertainty and lack of<br \/>\neconomic attractiveness has seen a shift of allocations away from Europe, pivoting<br \/>\ntowards China, despite some concerns at continuing trade wars. While central banks<br \/>\nhave maintained their commitment to alternative assets, there have been significant<br \/>\nchanges in their lower risk assets, moving from government bonds towards deposits and<br \/>\nin some cases gold, and from the US dollar to Renminbi.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Invesco released its seventh Invesco Global Sovereign Asset Management<br \/>\nStudy[[This is Invesco\u2019s seventh sovereign asset management study. In 2019 we conducted<br \/>\ninterviews with 139 funds: 68 sovereign investors and 71 central banks. The 2019<br \/>\nsovereign sample is split into three core segmentation parameters (sovereign investor<br \/>\nsegment, region and size of assets under management). The 2019 central banks sample<br \/>\nis broken down by developed vs emerging market.]], an annual in-depth report on the complex investment behaviour of sovereign wealth funds and central banks, which this year shows disenchantment with Europe among sovereign investors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":81112,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1481],"tags":[1809,1655,1657,1651,1437,1724,2091],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81114"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81114\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/81112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}