{"id":81284,"date":"2019-07-12T00:44:51","date_gmt":"2019-07-11T22:44:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/opinion\/ecb-worries-have-receded-but-fed-policy-doubts-have-some-pundits-on-the-defensive\/"},"modified":"2019-07-12T00:44:51","modified_gmt":"2019-07-11T22:44:51","slug":"ecb-worries-have-receded-but-fed-policy-doubts-have-some-pundits-on-the-defensive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/opinion\/ecb-worries-have-receded-but-fed-policy-doubts-have-some-pundits-on-the-defensive\/","title":{"rendered":"ECB worries have receded, but Fed policy doubts have some pundits on the defensive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I spent the past week in Knoxville, Tennessee, watching my daughter\u2019s basketball team<br \/>\nplay in a national tournament. I am the unofficial scorekeeper of the team, which makes<br \/>\nthe experience even more interesting, as I track the games on a variety of metrics.<br \/>\nWhat I found is that the risks to my daughter\u2019s team were different in each game,<br \/>\ndepending on the abilities of the opposing team. It reminded me that various market<br \/>\nenvironments present different risks and, just as quickly as one game ends and a new<br \/>\ngame against a different team begins, so too can environments change.<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s what we saw last week. One major risk that I have worried about for a year<br \/>\nnow was the potential for the next European Central Bank (ECB) president to be a<br \/>\nmonetary policy hawk. I felt that would create a significant headwind for European<br \/>\nmarkets, given that current ECB President Mario Draghi\u2019s dovishness had driven down<br \/>\nsystemic stress during his tenure. However, that risk dissipated last week with the<br \/>\nnomination of Christine Lagarde for the ECB presidency. <\/p>\n<p>Lagarde was a long-shot candidate, with pundits expecting Jens Weidmann of the<br \/>\nGerman Bundesbank as the most likely choice. Weidmann, who historically had been a<br \/>\nvociferous critic of quantitative easing, softened his rhetoric in recent months in an<br \/>\napparent attempt to secure the ECB position. However, in the horse trading that is a<br \/>\npart of determining who is nominated to EU leadership roles, French President<br \/>\nEmmanuel Macron was able to secure the nomination for his fellow French citizen,<br \/>\nLagarde. <\/p>\n<p>Like Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jay Powell, Lagarde is not an economist but does<br \/>\nhave relevant experience given her current role as the leader of the International<br \/>\nMonetary Fund and in her past experience as the Minister of the Economy, Finance and<br \/>\nIndustry. Based on all that I know of her and in particular from her statements in recent<br \/>\nyears, I believe she is the most likely to continue Draghi\u2019s dovish policies. I also believe<br \/>\nshe has the potential to be a visionary as leader of the ECB. She has long recognized<br \/>\nboth the disruptive and positive qualities of cryptocurrencies, blockchain and financial<br \/>\ntechnology in general. She is likely to work toward greater regulation that could<br \/>\nultimately lead to greater adoption. What\u2019s more, she is a career politician who may<br \/>\nironically be better equipped to fend off growing attempts to politicize central banks.<br \/>\nAll in all, I believe a key risk for European markets has dissipated.<\/p>\n<p><strong>As one risk recedes, another emerges<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But just as one risk dissipated, another appeared. That happened on Friday with the<br \/>\nrelease of the US employment situation report. It showed that job creation in June was<br \/>\nvery strong: 224,000 non-farm payrolls were added in the month, which was much<br \/>\nbetter than expected. This strong jobs report raised questions about whether the Fed<br \/>\ncould justify cutting rates in July, which sent stocks lower. After all, the market had<br \/>\nassumed the Fed would be loosening monetary policy in the short term, which has been<br \/>\nan important catalyst for the recent rally in stocks. And so now a new risk \u2014 that the<br \/>\nFed won\u2019t be able to justify a rate cut in the coming months \u2014 has arisen.<\/p>\n<p>However, I believe the Fed could certainly justify a rate cut. First of all, average hourly<br \/>\nearnings remain relatively tame at 3.1%1\u2014 well below where they would normally be at<br \/>\nthis stage in an expansion, suggesting inflation is likely to remain well contained. And<br \/>\nwhile June\u2019s jobs report was a blowout, it comes on the heels of more modest reports.<br \/>\nThe three-month average job gain for the second quarter, factoring in downward<br \/>\nrevisions to April and May, is slightly below the three-month average for the first<br \/>\nquarter and far below the three-month average for the fourth quarter.1 Alternatively,<br \/>\nthe Fed could simply choose to raise its inflation target, as various Federal Open Market<br \/>\nCommittee members have suggested in the last several months. While there is always<br \/>\nthe risk that the Fed will not get as accommodative as the market hopes for, it will likely<br \/>\nerr on the side of giving the market what it needs.<\/p>\n<p>The good news is that we could get a greater understanding of the risks facing markets<br \/>\nthis week through the words of Powell, who gives his semi-annual Humphrey-Hawkins<br \/>\ntestimony to Congress. He will likely get questions on a few topics currently in the<br \/>\nnews, including how he could justify a rate cut in the near term given relatively strong<br \/>\neconomic data such as Friday\u2019s jobs report \u2014 as well as the politicization of the Fed<br \/>\ngiven recent disparaging comments from President Donald Trump, and reports that the<br \/>\nWhite House had attempted to find a way to demote Powell. We were reminded just<br \/>\ntoday that the politicization of central banks could be a very real risk given Turkish<br \/>\nPresident Recep Tayyip Erdogan\u2019s firing of his central bank governor.<\/p>\n<p>We should learn more about what the Fed may do as we move closer to the July 30-31<br \/>\nFed meeting. In the meantime, I believe that signs point to an accommodative Fed. The<br \/>\nECB risk factor has gone away, but I don\u2019t believe another has emerged in its place.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I spent the past week in Knoxville, Tennessee, watching my daughter\u2019s basketball team play in a national tournament. I am the unofficial scorekeeper of the team, which makes the experience even more interesting, as I track the games on a variety of metrics. What I found is that the risks to my daughter\u2019s team were [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":81282,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1480],"tags":[1655,2073,1943,1651,1437,2087],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81284"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81284"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81284\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/81282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}