![\"-1017.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.next-finance.net\/http:\/\/beta.next-finance.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/1017.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nTesla was up an \u2018electrifying\u2019 75% during the month of August, with its market cap nearing the aggregate market cap of all listed automobile OEM
\nmanufacturers. We were puzzled as to the fundamental reasons behind Tesla\u2019s share price explosion (breakthroughs to be announced at its upcoming
\n\u2018Battery day\u2019?, underestimated total available market beyond electric vehicles?) and have seen, in the meantime, a partial, but unsatisfying,
\nexplanation: a trebling in calls activity in big tech stocks (and thus including Tesla) since a couple of months, causing dealers to hedge and buy the
\nunderlying stock, magnifying the up-moves. Although Tesla has (for now) a competitive advantage in terms of battery technology or in-house software
\nknow-how to facilitate self-driving cars in the future, it will not annihilate the whole automobile sector (including other contenders such as Uber and
\nWaymo). At the same time, it still has a lot to prove in adjacent areas (Tesla energy, insurance).<\/p>\n
We acknowledge there are some areas of froth in the market<\/strong> (besides electric vehicle-linked companies, we would mention some recent software A valuation exercise of these longer duration assets can obviously not be done irrespective of the interest rates and their future direction. With the From a more fundamental perspective, as mentioned in past updates, we are convinced that technology adoption (be it automation, cloud migration Let us take the construction market as an illustration of an end market where digitisation is still in its infancy<\/strong>. Designing, planning and building an This brings us right at the heart of a key debate among market participants that has swelled in importance after the well-anticipated Fed\u2019s new Equity markets have been fairly resilient despite the resurgence of COVID cases and the uneven recovery we have seen till now.<\/strong> Some parts of the
\nIPO\u2019s). Still,we would refrain from making comparisons to the tech bubble of 2000.<\/strong> In terms of valuation, we highlight the strong underlying earnings
\nmomentum (see graph 2) of the Tech sector (IT and Communication services) and an average free cash flow (FCF) yield of 3.5% (due to its highest FCF
\nconversion of any GICS1 sector), which is about in line with the market\u2019s average.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\nFed signalling last week it will not raise rates till Q4 2023 after adopting a new policy framework (allowing inflation to overshoot the 2% level) and our
\nconviction that over the next couple of years inflationary pressures should be moderate (more on that below), one can expect long-term rates to
\nremain subdued.<\/p>\n
\nor less straightforward technology trends, such as AI, big data, machine learning..) still has a long way to go in a multitude of end markets.<\/strong> The
\nwhole COVID crisis and ensuing lockdowns have only accelerated the trend, without any meaningful cannibalisation impact on the respective
\naddressable markets in the future. Given the inherent scalability of most of these technology companies (especially software-related ones), adding
\nsales comes at very low marginal costs. As a result, it enables fast margin progression and strong FCF generation. This also helps to explain the
\nrelatively higher price earnings ratio or price-to-sales multiples of some of these software companies, obviously provided that they are able to keep
\ntheir competitive advantages.<\/p>\n
\noffice building, with different parties involved (architect, contractor, subcontractors) is still mostly done with pen and paper. This causes substantial
\ndelays, cost overruns and wastage. With Building Information Management software, all these parties are digitally connected, helping to digitise in
\n3D the entire cycle of designing and building the office. Direct cost savings are substantial (around 25%) especially if construction projects are complex.
\nHowever other indirect cost savings (project on time, less wastage) or benefits (think better energy efficiency of the office building) can be realised.
\nThe UK construction market is the furthest penetrated in Europe (25%) but some emerging markets like Brazil or China are only 2-3% penetrated. This
\nexample not only validates our point that technology adoption has a long leeway for further growth but also emphasises the deflationary forces
\ncaused by the same adoption. Other tech applications harnessing substantial cost efficiencies that come to our mind are precision farming, augmented
\nreality (e.g. Hololens), machine learning and vision\u2026<\/p>\n
\npolicy framework: inflation, its potential impact on different asset classes, and whether it could cause a major style rotation within equity.<\/strong> This
\nparticipant is rather lukewarm on inflation spiralling higher over a relevant time horizon of 3-5 years. Although the size of the monetary and fiscal
\npolicy response to the pandemic is unprecedented (and will be sustained for the foreseeable future), there are strong disinflationary forces \u2013 on top
\nof further tech adoption \u2013 one should not dismiss: significant output gaps, ageing of society (keeping velocity of money at bay), massive debt loads,
\nincreasing prevalence of zombie companies inhibiting pricing power of peers.<\/strong> Additionally, given the gap between the earnings yield and risk free
\nrates, equities carry a more-than-reasonable inflation hedge. Thus, the inflation impact on any potential equity style rotation should not be
\noverplayed. Rather, it merits more attention to focus on the structural drivers of any growth or value oriented sector to gauge its potential longer
\nterm prospects. Banks, for instance, are often touted as inflationary beneficiaries (due to the link with a steepening yield curve), but we deem
\nstructural headwinds more impactful and increasing in the longer term: the upcoming IPO of ANT Financial illustrates this conviction, as it encroaches
\nmore into the different traditional m\u00e9tiers of a bank in China (payment, consumer finance, wealth management, loans to small and medium-sized
\nenterprises ) leveraging on its vast, installed user base and offering a superior consumer experience. In developed markets, more platform or fintech
\nproviders adopt ANT\u2019s playbook, who itself is also starting to make inroads in developed markets. Banks risk being stuck in the middle (losing access
\nto the final client), especially if they are not cognisant of this disruptive force and unable to adapt swiftly. Again, digitisation is crucial here.<\/p>\n
\neconomy have recovered quickly, or are even overheating (look no further than the US lumber prices). However, subsectors relying on crowds
\ncontinue to be affected and some, like the airline industry, have announced sizeable layoffs. Given the inherent labour intensity of these subindustries, social inequality (especially in the US) has further increased. More targeted fiscal measures are needed. Although Democrats and
\nRepublicans have not agreed on a new fiscal package yet, we expect a consensus to be reached. Unfortunately, nowadays, more often than before,
\nthis happens after some \u2018rounds of political posturing\u2019. Likewise in Europe, with a renewed episode in the Brexit saga, we also expect a middle ground
\nto be found in the latest hour. With the advent of an effective vaccine (at the end of the year or beginning of next year), continued monetary and
\nincreased fiscal support, we expect the macro bounce to continue and to be more evenly spread. This could benefit companies that have seen the
\nbiggest impact from the sanitary crisis, although we would be very selective in picking so-called COVID-losers. The quality of the business model,
\nbalance sheet, and the potential to emerge stronger are key aspects in this selection process. As said on previous occasions, the core of any equity
\nportfolio should consist of quality companies that are able to grow their top line through the cycle, with competitive advantages, relatively low
\nleverage, less prone to disruptive forces and \u2013ideally- with an ability to capitalise on the so-called sustainable development goals. In sum, a mildly
\npositive backdrop for equity markets, although we do not expect fireworks either, as a widespread recovery has been well anticipated<\/strong> (and big
\nindex constituents have already done well this year). We stick to our view of a range-bound equity environment. Often, most of the upside in equity
\nmarkets is realised when \u2018things go from very bad to bad.\u2019<\/strong> In our view, the biggest risks for the last quarter of the year are a contested US election
\nand a renewed spike in mortality rates due to COVID.<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/figure>