Note

Why the ECB asset quality review, stress test raise longer term questions

snl_financial_-_why_the_ecb_asset_quality_review_stress_test_raise_longer_term_questions.jpg
Although "only" 25 banks failed the ECB test, the central bank's health check shows that others have reasons to be concerned. SNL data sheds light on some of the implications of the exercise, not only for the failed banks, but also the "near misses."

SNL’s tables showing the asset quality of the failed banks indicates that they could require more capital than the ECB has demanded. Few show an AQR-adjusted coverage ratio higher than 50% with several having figures below 30%. Moreover, the coverage ratios of the loans newly-classified as nonperforming are typically lower than extant NPLs in the corporate book.

snl_financial_-_why_the_ecb_asset_quality_review_stress_test_raise_longer_term_questions.jpg

The AQR, however, saw coverage ratios rise in general due to adjustments based on the credit file sampling and projections as well as model differences. It particularly reflects collateral revaluation. In the list of the failed banks, this resulted in significant improvements in their coverage and thus important reductions in their stated or potential capital shortfalls.

Overall, while soured loans rose, their coverage did so too. Unsurprisingly, the AQR adjustments for NPEs particularly affected Austrian, Greek, Italian, Irish and Spanish lenders.

About the author

Next Finance

Next Finance

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Categories